I’m not typically one for inspirational internet videos, but this one gets me every time.
That, dear readers, is what America’s all about. Happy Independence Day weekend!
So, there is only one spam comment this go-round, but it’s a good one:
I am a Scorpio man and I’ve often questioned, How is a traditional Scorpio man in love?
I… really don’t know what to tell you.
I’ve reduced the price of my first book to $0.99, as a sort of promotion for my new book. Also, I’ve learned that there is a free Kindle Reading App for those of you who don’t have Kindles, but still are interested in reading these.
I’m going to slow down the pace on releasing books now for a bit–I have more projects I am working on, but they will take a while. Plus, I was so busy with writing TSotMW that I had to cut back on the blogging. The idea had come to me, and I wanted to get it all down as quickly as i could, but the blogging definitely suffered as a result. Hopefully, I’ll be able to balance things better going forward.
I expected “The Last Lovecraft: Relic of Cthulhu” to be unwatchable. Anytime you see a DVD for $2.00, you can’t have high hopes. But, Lovecraft movies aren’t super-common, so I thought I’d give it a try, fully expecting to stop watching after five minutes.
I was very pleasantly surprised.
The movie stars Kyle Davis as Jeff Phillips, the last living relative of horror-writer Howard Phillips Lovecraft. Jeff and his friend Charlie (Devin McGinn, also the film’s writer) are entrusted by a secret society to protect an ancient relic that the Cult of Cthulhu is trying to steal to awaken the infamous Sea-Monster-God. Only Jeff has Lovecraft’s genetic ability to resist the telepathic powers of the Cultists, which drive all others who meet them insane.
If this premise sounds a little silly, well, it is. That’s because the movie is a horror/comedy, but I’d say it’s about 80% comedy, and 20% horror. And it works. It’s a very amusing little adventure, while still being reasonably faithful to the principles of Lovecraftian-ism.
The monster special effects are horribly cheap and hokey-looking, but it all works because (a) it’s a comedy and (b) Lovecraftian horror isn’t really about the monsters you see; it’s about the monsters you don’t see. Granted “Lovecraft” and “comedy” are two words you don’t often see together, but in this case, the two blend pretty well.
Is it a great movie? No, but it’s a lot of a fun for anybody who enjoys Lovecraft’s “Yog-Sothothery” but doesn’t take the “Mythos” too seriously. It’s the most successful blend of cosmic horror and comedy I’ve seen since the great “Fishmen” musical adaptation of “The Shadow Over Innsmouth”.
The only other thing I’d add is that if you are offended by coarse language, you might want to steer clear. There is a lot of swearing, although it never felt forced or like “swearing for the sake of swearing”. There is also a fair amount of violence, what with the monsters eating people etc., but frankly, the effects are so silly it barely qualifies as violence in my book. Your mileage may vary.
As promised, my new novella is available now. Click the image below to get it:
Here’s the description from the Amazon page:
“Agents Maynard and Brett are no strangers to complex mysteries and morally grey assignments. When they are sent in pursuit of a mysterious rabble-rousing radio personality, however, they stumble upon a web of conspiracy and betrayal beyond anything they could have imagined. As events lead them from the brooding hills of Appalachia to the remotest wastes of Siberia to the deserts of the American southwest, they discover unlikely allies and twisted madmen, scientists bent on playing God, and mounting evidence hinting at sinister machinations that threaten the entire nation. With each thrilling episode, the ever-escalating power and scope of the danger they face forces them to call upon all their skills and experience to survive.”
I just read an interesting article called “The Hidden Artistry of the Star Wars prequels”, by Mike Klimo. It’s a very good (and very long) reinterpretation of the prequels that defends them very cleverly. Klimo argues that they have a lot of hidden symbolism and intentional echoes of the original trilogy, to a degree few realize, designed to create an intricate story structure. And indeed, some of the shots in the prequels are uncannily similar to scenes in the original.
Frankly, though I am a staunch defender of the prequels, not all the arguments persuaded me. I think in some cases the reason for the similarities between the two trilogies is that “George Lucas likes those kinds of shots”, rather than “George Lucas was deliberately telling a subtle and complex visual narrative.” Because frankly, one flaw in the Star Wars series is that the six films do not fit together visually–the switch from Episode III to Episode IV is incredibly jarring, and makes it feel like a completely different series.
Nevertheless, it is a very good article, and raises interesting observations and details, as well as talking about a style of narrative I’d never heard of before. If you have time for a long read, it is quite thought-provoking for anyone interested in movies.
That’s right! Unlike my previous one, this book is much longer. I wrote in a very different style from the earlier stories. It started as an exercise to break writer’s block, where I simply started writing whatever came to mind without worrying about it, and I was so pleased with the result, I decided to edit it a bit, and I plan to publish it on Kindle in the next few weeks. I’ll be posting more info on it soon.